Crops News

Research: Organic soybean growers can be competitive using little or no tillage

Published:

The United States has long had a problem with the domestic production of organic soybeans — quantity has simply been lacking. Because of that, organically labeled soybeans are routinely imported from overseas, where numerous reports have shown fraudulent labeling or organic standards to be more lax. New research out of Penn State, however, is suggesting that organic soybean producers using no-till and reduced-tillage production methods and incorporating cover crops can achieve similar yields at competitive costs compared to tillage-based production. For the tillage-heavy organic sector, this is good news, especially if it means more American farmers will choose to pursue this production method.

The experiment focused on finding ways to reduce the intensity or frequency of tillage or soil disturbance in organic field crop production systems — tillage is the primary way many organic farmers combat weed pressures. Researchers on certified organic land at Penn State’s Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Center compared tillage-based soybean production preceded by a cover crop mixture interseeded into corn, with reduced-tillage soybean production preceded by a roller-crimped cereal rye cover crop that was sown after corn silage.

cereal rye
Cereal rye shown here is being mechanically terminated with a roller-crimper in an organic no-till soybean system. (Image courtesy of John Wallace, Penn State University)

According to lead researcher John Wallace and his team, the reduced-tillage soybean sequence resulted in 50 percent less soil disturbance compared to the tillage-based soybean sequence across study years, promising substantial gains in water quality and soil conservation. In addition, budget comparisons showed that the reduced-tillage soybean sequence resulted in lower input costs than the tillage-based soybean sequence. However, the reduced-tillage system was about $46 per acre less profitable because of lower average yields.

“Organic grain producers are interested in reducing tillage to conserve soil and decrease labor and fuel costs,” Wallace said. “In our research, we examined agronomic and economic tradeoffs associated with alternative strategies for reducing tillage frequency and intensity in a cover crop-soybean sequence, within a corn-soybean-spelt organic cropping system.”

Weeds are a serious problem for organic growers of field crops because growers are unable to kill them with targeted synthetic herbicides. Significantly, researchers found that weed biomass did not differ between soybean-production strategies. That matters because tillage and cultivation are the primary methods used by organic producers to reduce weeds and other pests.

Tillage-based soybean production marginally increased grain yield by fewer than three bushels per acre compared with the reduced-tillage soybean system.

The study, recently published in Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, is the latest in a 15-year-long line of organic no-till research conducted in the College of Agricultural Sciences and led by William Curran, professor emeritus of weed science. Although he retired last year, Curran also participated in this study. Organic no-till field crop research continues at Penn State under the direction of Wallace and entomologist Mary Barbercheck.

Finding ways to allow more domestic production of organic soybeans is a huge issue, Wallace contends, because more than 70 percent of the organic soybeans that feed organically produced poultry in the U.S. are imported. They primarily come from Turkey, India, and Argentina.

“There have been many cases of fraudulent imports — crops that were not really produced organically — coming from some of those countries, and that’s depressed the premiums that U.S. producers are getting because we’re being flooded with these imports,” Wallace said. “And they’re driving down the prices that U.S. producers can get.”

Any views or opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect those of AGDAILY. Comments on this article reflect the sole opinions of their writers.
Previous Article Next Page